Identity and cover
What is the contracting entity, and which insurance or required certificates apply to this work?
Builder qualification guide
The right partner is the company that can deliver this design, in this venue, on these dates, under the agency boundaries you require—not simply the company with the most impressive gallery.
Qualification
A strong answer includes evidence and project-specific detail. A weak answer relies on generic assurances. Record the response, the responsible person and any supporting document before treating a capability as confirmed.
What is the contracting entity, and which insurance or required certificates apply to this work?
Which comparable projects or venues can be evidenced, and what part did the company perform?
Which workshop, project manager and installation crew are reserved for the actual dates?
Which elements are made in-house, rented or subcontracted, and who remains accountable?
Who reviews drawings, venue rules, structural details, electrical loads and service orders?
Are transport, overtime, organizer services, handling, dismantling and likely extras visible?
What are the approval, artwork, production, dispatch, installation and snagging deadlines?
Which drawings, samples, proofs, workshop photos or pre-build checks will be supplied?
Who makes decisions if access is delayed, an item is damaged or a requirement changes on site?
Will the partner sign and follow agreed branding, confidentiality and client-contact rules?
Red flags
No single warning sign proves that a supplier is unsuitable, but unresolved uncertainty should change the decision. Ask for clarification before comparing price or releasing production.
The number is presented quickly, but services, quantities and exclusions are not described.
The portfolio is strong, yet the actual workshop, crew or specialist ownership cannot be confirmed.
Deadlines exist, but nobody is responsible for approvals, artwork, dispatch or site recovery.
The supplier expects direct end-client contact before the agency has defined that boundary.
Decision record
Create a short decision record covering scope fit, price confidence, timing, technical risk, communication and evidence. Note every open item and who must close it. The preferred builder does not need to score highest in every category, but the accepted trade-offs must be visible.
References should be checked for relevance: similar venue, construction type, size, schedule or client boundary. A famous project in a portfolio is not evidence that the same company, crew or production model is available now.
Working files
Primary venue sources
Frequently asked questions
No. Distance affects logistics, but capability, dates, stock, crew, venue familiarity and subcontracting may matter more. Compare total delivery risk and cost.
Not necessarily. A transparent, well-controlled subcontracting model can work. What matters is knowing who performs each task and who remains accountable.
Ask what the supplier actually delivered, when, at which venue and under which constraints. Where appropriate, request permission to contact a relevant reference.
Early enough to complete technical review, venue approvals, service orders, artwork and production without relying on premium rush work. The exact lead time depends on the project and show calendar.
BuildAcross / 01
Share the project requirements. BuildAcross can structure the qualification criteria and assess a local delivery path for the actual dates.
Review a European project